13

Comments

Facebook

Twitter

Google

send


Hanin Ghaddar

Why Hezbollah will have to leave Syria

The Party of God has reached a point where the costs outweigh the benefits

A shop in Dahiyeh
A shop in Dahiyeh

If Hezbollah’s constituency has learned anything recently, it is that nothing comes without a price. The Party of God always calculates its moves and measures wins and losses before embarking on new adventures, and they always prepare themselves to deal with the losses as much as they invest in victories. However, their descent into Syria has probably been their most miscalculated move. Their losses have surpassed the gains, and the withdrawal from Syria will become a necessity for survival.

 

Hezbollah and its leadership in Iran did not expect their battle in Syria to last this long: they probably thought they’d go in, wipe out the rebels in a matter of days or weeks at most, and then return without anyone knowing. This was obviously a fatal miscalculation. Not only could they not wipe out the opposition and maintain Assad’s unified rule, but now many in Lebanon and the region consider them the number-one culprit in the ongoing war in Syria. The sectarian tension has never been this dangerous and the Shia community is starting to wonder whether it’s all worth it. On the political level, Iran has realized that its regional role has not been empowered by the intervention.

 

The question is how much longer Hezbollah can suffer the repercussions of their involvement in Syria. In other words, what is the point at which the promised victory can no longer justify the cost?

 

If you pay Dahiyeh a visit today, you will probably feel like you’re in a ghost town. Residents now refer to the road to Beirut’s southern suburbs as “the road to death.” The once-busy streets, formerly bustling with consumers and vendors, are now empty and weary. You can sense panic in every corner.

 

On top of the looming feeling of fear, people in Dahiyeh are losing their businesses and livelihoods. Commodities and services are known to be cheaper in the suburbs than elsewhere in Beirut, a role that constitutes the core of Dahiyeh’s economy. But no one now dares to step into Dahiyeh for anything. Even its residents are asked by officials to stay home unless for emergencies.

 

Meanwhile, Hezbollah’s officials have moved from Dahiyeh to safer locations, leaving the people to their fate.  

 

To top it all off, Hezbollah internal sources are talking about more than 1,000 wounded and 400 dead fighters in Syria, whose bodies have been returned to their families without any tangible signs of victory.

 

These losses have crippled Hezbollah’s rhetoric about the threat of Sunni radicals. If Hezbollah has gone to Syria to stop them from coming to Lebanon, then Hezbollah has failed, dramatically.

 

Hezbollah’s failure in this issue means that the Party of God is not as omnipotent as it wants us to believe. This is a major blow to Hezbollah: if their own constituency started questioning the supremacy of the party, the aura of sacredness will dissolve and everything will go downhill from there.

 

On the political and diplomatic level, Hezbollah’s leadership in Tehran – the Revolutionary Guards – has also suffered a blow to its authority. Iran has been uninvited to the Geneva II meeting in Montreux and lost its status in an assembly that is supposed to eventually, even if not immediately, determine the future of the region.

 

This is a clear message to Iran that its deal with the US is only about the nuclear program and has no bearing on its regional role, which is Iran’s main priority. It is also a sign to the Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah that their aggressive involvement in Syria did not and will not translate in a more powerful regional role: on the contrary, it is costing them. Indeed, they are excluded from Geneva today because of their involvement in Syria.

 

Inside Iran, this has had serious ramifications. The friction between the two camps, the Revolutionary Guards and Ayatollah Khamenei on the one hand vs. President Rouhani and former President Rafsanjani on the other, has escalated in the aftermath of this diplomatic blow. These developments have pushed Iran’s Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, to deny Friday that his country had sent Hezbollah militants to fight in Syria, saying the Tehran-backed Shiite extremist group was making its own decisions. He also asked for all foreign elements to leave Syria and for the Syrian people to decide their own future.

 

Moreover, the Party of God has suffered a major ethical blow. There is now clear evidence that Syria has systematically tortured and executed about 11,000 detainees since the start of the uprising, according to a report published last week. Hezbollah is aiding a war criminal. This is not a small detail and it will cost Hezbollah serious moral credibility.

 

In sum, Iran is split over Hezbollah’s role in Syria, and the Shiite community in Lebanon is questioning the Party’s misadventure. Assad is still in power, true, but the regime has weakened drastically, and its delegation in Geneva II could not sell the “terrorism agenda” anymore. It was obvious that the transition of power is the sole item on the Geneva II agenda for everyone, except Russia, which stood alone when its Iranian ally was excluded.

 

What’s the use, then? Hezbollah has lost substantially on the local and international fronts and has not gained much in return. The decision to withdraw from Syria is becoming inevitable unless Hezbollah is ready to sacrifice not only the Shiite community in Lebanon but also the status and power of the party itself. At the end of the day, Hezbollah and its arms are the main priority for Iran. Syria and its regime are mere tools to empower Hezbollah: they will not sacrifice Hezbollah for Assad.

 

Even now it might be too late, and Hezbollah will have to pay a steep price for their intervention. Assad will go, and they know it. So the question now is whether they will try to minimize the cost.

 

Hanin Ghaddar is the managing editor of NOW. She tweets @haningdr 

Fortifying Dahiyeh's battered economy. (Image via Facebook)

"If their own constituency started questioning the supremacy of the party, the aura of sacredness will dissolve and everything will go downhill from there."

  • Vlad Tepes

    Just dumb assumptions. Hezbollah planned to wipe them out quickly and return with no one knowing? Dude, they talked about coming in there for a while before they did. Then they sat on the border in full combat gear and weaponry as cars on the highway drove by and honked and screamed. What in the... Dude, Hanin, seriously? They initially wanted to remove rebels from Qusair because of its proximity to Lebanon. Then they were bogged down into an even bigger conflict. Many of the fighters they lost was due to poor intelligence and sending in inexperienced fighters that were completely unprepared for what was about to happen. I don't know why you spread these blatant lies. Do you think it look good on you or your website? It doesn't. Being pretty doesn't excuse slander.

    January 31, 2014

  • kam.jana.7

    LOL what a shaggy-dog story HA has already got all it wanted.IT SAVED ASSAD'S REGIME FROM COLLAPSE and they have gained much compared to what they have lost. they helped to recapture qusayr then qarah then alnabk and now they are gearing up to recapture yabrud. they are even forcing the rebels to surrender in eastern ghouta and SAA is advancing there. even if bashar goes it's system will be kept intact and HA will have it's supply sources. let's say HA lost 500 fighters from the beginning of the war ,the rebels lost 1000+ just in qusayr(i bet half of them were lebanese sunnis also i got this figure from the same source u got HA casualties).in a war this big 500 is nothing.and about iran there is no friction between two camps in iran. rouhani became president by khamenei's consent and he does what khamenei tells him to do being invited to geneva is not important for iran cause right now in tehran u.s and french diplomats are in talks with the iranian government about syria PS why u feel pity for shias when u hate their guts?

    January 30, 2014

  • MC Hammer

    The irony in all of this is that all sides hustle to buy arms to fight the opponent and "express their mind and create a better life for themselves and families and countries or some other cause". Then, when no one wins because they miscalculated the strengths of the opponents (from all sides mind you), they go to the same people where they bought the arms and ask for bandages, and for help to end the violence through mediation and behind secret doors "not so much secret these days", hoping above all not to lose fate and keep their courage up. I just feel bad for those lost generations after generations that get burnt away for the benefits of the few who lead them to the fire every time.

    January 29, 2014

  • jrocks

    as much as i would like to believe this, it all feels like wishful thinking

    January 28, 2014

  • politik

    Pro-Hizb posters are nitpicking on little details in Hanin's article as they know full well the the overall premise is accurate.

    January 28, 2014

  • mjay

    does it make sense that one week it's five hundred then next it's four hundred? (...) I truly question the intentions and credibility of the writer. Is she purposely trying to exaggerate losses? on what basis can she claim to know about the military objectives of the operations in Syria? for all we know, they have been achieved. Assad is in a stronger position then ever before, and the rebels and their supporters are resorting to desperate measures (suicide bombings in civilian areas, infighting, and in some cases, as in Barzeh, outright surrendering to the regime)

    January 28, 2014

  • mjay

    Hanin, shou hal kizib? is it 400 fighters lost, or 500 fighters like you said 2 weeks ago in your article "Why Lebanon still matters?"? did 100 come back to life? I can't wait to read next week's article, "Lebanese welcome ISIS and Nusra with open arms".

    January 28, 2014

  • Snake Oil Baron

    The damage being done to Hezbollah and Iran (and to a lesser extent, Russia) is the reason the West and the Arab world has acted to prolong this conflict. For the small price of tens of thousands of dead Sunni civilians, a few million refugees and massive but localized destruction, they get to grind down some supposedly dangerous enemies. Realpolitik with, we believe, no negative consequences. Nothing could pussibly go wrung.

    January 28, 2014

  • richard.rittenburg

    that is nonsense. if the west wanted to damage Iranian and Russian hegemony then it would have shipped anit-aircraft and anti-tank weapons to Syrian rebels.

    January 28, 2014

  • Hanibaal-Atheos

    No, this is not nonsense. Your approach, which is basically the cowboyish a-la-George Bush let's go get'em approach, is stupid. No amount of weaponry you send the rebels would do any damage to Russia or Iran, short of invading Syria and repeating the Iraq and Afghanistan blunders. Obama and the West in general are taking the smart route - unlike your Bush-John Wayne route - to let the two sides, both essentially and ultimately inimical to the West, bleed on another to death. I love watching Syria collapse on the heads of all the protagonists: Sunni extremists, Shiite extremists, Baathist Trans-Arab nationalists, and all those who have inflicted destruction and oppression of their own people, AND managed 50 years of hateful anti-Western ideology and terrorism. Nothing wrong with the current approach. Thank you, Snake Oil Baron.

    January 28, 2014

  • lebanesecitizen

    Meanwhile, Hezbollah’s officials have moved from Dahiyeh to safer locations, leaving the people to their fate. Just a question from a lebanese citizen: hanin ghaddar where did you get that? Can you make an investigation about it and show it to us? I am just astonished by your work, israel couldn't figure out where hezbollah's officials are residing and you are sharing this info as if you have inside source. So full of confidence ! I think comments are allowed in order for you to answer so waiting for your clever answer :) such a journalist you are!! :)

    January 27, 2014

  • richard.rittenburg

    Hezzbollah's greatest enemy is their own hypocrisy and sectarian agenda. Without Christian support they can not control government. With soldiers bleeding in Syria they can not stage an armed coup. Without government protection they will be exposed as assassins and hypocrites. If they do not withdraw from Syria then it is the end for them.

    January 27, 2014

  • Hanibaal-Atheos

    I disagree. Hezbollah's lifeline is in Syria. Hezbollah will fight to the death for the Syrian regime. Cut off the umbilical cord that the Assad regime has extended Hezbollah for 30+ years, and Hezbollah will suffocate in its own vomit. What Ms. Ghaddar may be confusing (in her biased Sunni mind) is Hezbollah on one hand, and the Shiite community in Lebanon on the other. The community's survival as a full-fledged member of Lebanon's constitutive communities is what is at stake, and to the extent that the Shiite community continues its subservience and/or remains hijacked by Hezbollah, its survival will be coupled with that of Hezbollah. In other words, based on your analysis, I see an upcoming schism WITHIN the Shiite community between Hezbollah (and the poodle Amal Movement for that matter) followers and the truly Lebanese Shiite patriots.

    January 27, 2014